It Happened On The Way To War Paper Essay Example for Free

It Happened On The Way To War Paper Essay It Happened On The Way To War is a book by Rye Barcott. This book talks about a marine who dreams of making a difference in the world. We read about his life, feeling as if we were a part of it. Three values that he clearly shows in this book are balance, leadership and Inspiration. Somebody once said that in order to succeed in life, you have to have a balance between your personal life and your professional life. Rye Barcott not only shows us the importance of having a balance, but he also shows us how hard it is to find that balance. While he was a part of the Marines, he was expected to transition easily from the combat mode to peace keeping mode. He thought that he will be able to separate the founder of Carolina for Kibera(CFK) from the marine that he was meant to be and vice versa. However as he started his journey, he soon realized how difficult finding balance actually is. After he came back from Kibera and started bootcamp. Rye noticed a difference in his performance. His said that for the first time in his life, he was in the bottom half of the class. â€Å" It’s like a dual culture shock† (90 Barcott, Rye) thats what is what his mother said that he was going through. This was the first time, we see Rye struggling to keep his personal and professional life separate. As time went by he was able to over come the cultural shock, however once he was an official marine. he was presented with a new challenge. He had to look at children that he was trying to improve the lives off, as potential suspects. As a marine he had to check kids that looked innocent for bombs and weapons and then then as a founder of CFK he had to go and help them. In my leadership class, I have been taught that in order to be a good leader you need to do 5 things. You have to model the way, inspire a shared vision, encourage the heart, challenge the process and enable others to act. In the book, Rye demonstrates most if not all of these 5 qualities. He modeled the way, by showing people that you don’t need to be rich in order to make a difference in the world, you just need dedication and a good group of people who are willing to work with you. When Rye met Salim, he decided to take take Salim’s vision of Kibera and make it his own. He inspired a shared a vision, Salim told Rye his dream about Kibera’s future and how he is currently trying to achieve it, however he probably did not expect Rye to actually support the dream or even come back to Kibera. However Rye shocked him by not only coming back to Kibera, but also by working with him to achieve his goal. Tabitha’s meeting with Rye is a great example of how Rye encouraged the heart.He had just met Tabitha and she was asking him to trust her and help her. There was no guarantee that Tabitha would succeed, but Rye supported her and helped her achieve her dream. Challenging the Process requires you to stand up and stand out of the crowd. There are many books published about a person and the amount of good her or she does in the world. However the reason that Rye’s story is different from others is because Rye is a marine. People are attracted to this book, because on the front cover the caption reads â€Å"A Marines Path To Peace† Which is very unique. When people think about the Marines, they think of war not peace. There aren’t many books about a marine that fights a war in the day, and runs a non-profit organization by night. The work that Rye does in his book, things like organizing soccer tournaments and trash clean ups, enables others to act. In order for the kids to play the sports, they have to help the community by cleaning up the trash. It taught the kids positive feedback. They did something good for others and in return they got something good out of it. This practice motivated the people of Kibera to act! This wasn’t the only way he enabled other to act, he was able to convince his friend Nate to help others and modeled the way for him. Inspiration is a huge deal in Rye’s life. He would have not achieved some much in his life, if he wasnt inspired by the people he met in his life. Tabitha and Salim showed him that even though they have faced many hardships, it is still possible to achieve your dreams as long as you work hard with passion and integrity. His teachers/professors at UNC helped him tremendously. When him and his friends weren’t able to get many funds, it was his professors that helped him get through, and motivated him and gave him guidance that eventually got him the funds that he needed. Not only did they guide him, but they helped him with his project. Professor Peacock and Kohn who he met in his freshman year helped him with his thesis in grad school and taught him how to run an effective non-profit organization. Even when he was a kid, his father’s marine friends were mentors for him. â€Å"My good fortune started when I was a bot.† (110, Barcott, Rye) They guided him and helped him realize his future plan. They guided him because they knew that he would in return be an inspiration and guide others in the future. Which is exactly what he did. He became an inspiration for the kids of Kibera. Rye Barcott’s journey in this book, wasn’t an easy one. The three values that he demonstrated in this book, balance, leadership and inspiration made him very unique. When he first started his journey, he did not have all three values, however as he grew as a person, he developed these values and tried to perfect them. Work Cited †¢ Barcott, Rye. Carolina For Kibera. N.p., n.d. Web. . †¢ Barcott, Rye. It Happend on the Way to War. USA: Bloomsbury, 2011. Print.

A Comparison of Homeric Formalism in The Iliad and The Odyssey Essay

Homeric Formalism in The Iliad and The Odyssey "Much that is terrible takes place in the Homeric poems, but it seldom takes place wordlessly... no speech is so filled with anger or scorn that the particles which express logical and grammatical connections are lacking or out of place." (from "Odysseus' Scar" by Erich Auerbach)    In his immaculately detailed study comparing the narrative styles of Homer to those of the Bible, Erich Auerbach hits upon one of the most notable intrigues of reading Homer, namely his unrelenting sense of epic form and rhythm. The stories that unfold in the works of Homer are filled with passion and fury, but this never effects the meticulous regulation of his narrative. One of the chief questions regarding the works of Homer is to what effectual end he follows this formula so explicitly. In both The Iliad and The Odyssey, the reader recognizes patterns and formulae that combine to make up the Homeric template.    The reader can first recognize Homer's formulaic style on a specific scale in the repetition of phrases and epithets. Odysseus, throughout both The Iliad and The Odyssey is almost never mentioned without a reference to his cunning or "many designs". Likewise, throughout The Iliad the city of Troy is almost never mentioned without reference to it being "strong-walled" or "wide-wayed". As Richard Lattimore writes in the introduction to his translation, much of this particular kind of repetition was dictated by the metric needs of the poem. Above and beyond this strictly mechanical function however, recurring descriptions serve to ground the story in a cast of recognizable characters, thus creating a sense of familiarity for the reader.    Studying ... ...tions of the Odyssey,   Frankfurt, Athenaeum 1988 Hamilton, Edith. The Greek Way. New York: W.W. Norton and Company, Inc., 1930. Heubeck, Alfred, J.B. Hainsworth, et al. A commentary on Homer's Odyssey. 3 Vols. Oxford PA4167 .H4813 1988 Homer. The Odyssey. Trans. Robert Fitzgerald. New York: Vintage Books, 1989. Nussbaum, Martha C. "Victims and Agents: What Greek Tragedy can teach us about sympathy and responsibility." Boston Review. (1999)31 May 1999 Stanford, William Bedell. Homer's Odyssey. 2 Vols. Macmillan  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   The Iliad. Trans. Robert Fagles. New York: Penguin Books, 1990. The Iliad of Homer. Trans. Richmond Lattimore. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1951. Tracy, Stephen V. ,The Story of the Odyssey Princeton UP 1990 "Gospel of Matthew". The Holy Bible. New Revised Standard Version. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1989.

Review of Mel Gibson as Hamlet Essay

In Franco Zeffirelli’s Hamlet he seems to have no intention of changing the material of the play or giving it any sort of new unique perspective. Some mscenes have been revised or talks moved starting with one character onto the next, but aside from the scene added after Hamlet’s father’s death where Claudius, Gertrude, and Hamlet argue over his body, being added, the movie is fairly accurate to the original play. From the film’s first scene, which happens not on the bulwarks with the phantom of Hamlet’s father however at the killed lord’s memorial service, we are bolted into Hamlet’s anger and disillusionment. Gibson plays him, there’s nothing adademic or neurasthenic about this irate youthful man; he’s not a hypochondriac. Rather, he appears to be somewhat foursquare and plain and all excessively advocated in his shock. Gibson’s execution is powerful and extravagant; he’s amusing to watch, and thereâ€℠¢s never a minute when he appears to be short of what sufficient to the undertaking he’s embraced. At the end of the day, he practically pulls it off. Where Gibson falls flat is in making the part his own. Not even once do we sense the performer feeling his route through the part, taking it inside and re-envisioning it for himself. Gibson peruses the part well, however in his grasp the verse never wakes up. He doesn’t thoroughly consider his direction his enormous monologues, uncovering them as he comes; he presents them, in the same way as an A person who’s carried out his homework. Thus, there aren’t numerous dim corners in this present Hamlet’s mind. Others in the cast make up sort of for this lack. There’s honest to goodness slightness and franticness, for instance, in Helena Bonham-Carter’s disentangled Ophelia; she’s similar to a cloth doll losing its stuffings. What’s more Paul Scofield’s concise presence as the ruler has an unpleasant gravity. Gibson has no less than one bravura minute, however. It comes when he jumps on his mother (Glenn Close) in her bunk after he’s wounded Polonius (the celestially confused Ian Holm), and there’s such exposed sexual animosity in the assault – and its met with such open ardor from Clos e’s Gertrude – that for a moment the relationship appears laden with until now undreamed-of potential outcomes. It’s a mixing, nervy meeting. This is Close’s best minute as well. Anyhow if the foundations of Gibson’s execution are in the twentieth century, Close’s are in the nineteenth. Generally she appears corseted and counterfeit, in the same way as a dramatic grande woman unable to relax. (Her passing scene, however, is  a genuine corker.) Bates admissions better as Claudius, especially in the last scene when, by mishap, Gertrude drinks the toxic substance that he’d planted for Hamlet, and the look all over turns into that of a terrible doggy sitting tight for its discipline. As an executive, Zeffirelli is preferred with furniture over he is with the Polaroid, yet in this last scene he does animate himself to a swashbuckling thrive. In organizing his â€Å"Villa,† Zeffirelli hasn’t exceeded himself or made saddling requests on the parts of his gathering of people that could be greater enthusiasts of Mel Gibson than they are of Shakespeare. What he’s carried out, basically, is strap a couple of skates on its feet and point it downhill. He’s made a populist, respectable and determinedly not for the ages.

What Is the Logan Act

The Logan Act is an early federal law that prohibits private citizens from conducting foreign policy on behalf of the United States. No one has ever been convicted under the Logan Act. Although the law has never been used, it is often discussed in political contexts, and it has remained on the books since it was passed in 1799. Key Takeaways: The Logan Act The Logan Act of 1799 is an early federal law prohibiting unauthorized diplomacy on behalf of the United States.No one has ever been convicted of violating the Logan Act. Despite never being enforced, the Logan Act remains in effect to this day and is often mentioned in political contexts. Its perhaps fitting that the Logan Act is frequently mentioned in political contexts, as it was conceived in the contentious political climate during the administration of Federalist John Adams. It was named for Dr. George Logan, a Philadelphia Quaker and Republican of the era (meaning he was aligned with Thomas Jefferson, not the president day Republican Party). In the 1960s, there were calls for the Logan Act to be used against protesters of the Vietnam War. Calls for it to be used against Rev. Jesse Jackson in the 1980s were tamped down by President Ronald Reagan. The New York Times, in an editorial published in 1980, referred to the law as quaint and suggested it be scrapped, but the Logan Act has endured. Origins of the Logan Act A trade embargo imposed by France in the late 1790s created serious diplomatic tensions which prompted the French to imprison some American sailors. In the summer of 1798 a Philadelphia physician, Dr. George Logan, sailed to France as a private citizen and sought to improve relations between the two countries. Logans mission was successful. France released American citizens and lifted its embargo. When he returned to America, Logan was hailed by the Republicans as a hero but was severely criticized by the Federalists. The Adams administration decided to take action to prevent private citizens from conducting American foreign policy and a new law to address the situation was introduced in Congress. It passed through Congress and was signed into law by President Adams in January 1799. The text of the law is as follows: Any citizen of the United States, wherever he may be, who, without authority of the United States, directly or indirectly commences or carries on any correspondence or intercourse with any foreign government or any officer or agent thereof, with intent to influence the measures or conduct of any foreign government or of any officer or agent thereof, in relation to any disputes or controversies with the United States, or to defeat the measures of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both. This section shall not abridge the right of a citizen to apply, himself or his agent, to any foreign government or the agents thereof for redress of any injury which he may have sustained from such government or any of its agents or subjects. Applications of the Logan Act Legal scholars believe the law may be unconstitutional, as it is so broadly written. But because it is never used, there has not been a court case in which it has been challenged. Following the criticism of his trip to France, and the peculiar distinction of having a law named for him, Dr. George Logan was elected as a United States Senator from Pennsylvania. He served from 1801 to 1807. After returning to private life, Logan himself seemed not to care about the law carrying his name. According to a biography of Logan written by his widow following his death in 1821, he had traveled to London in 1809, at a time of increasing tensions between the United States and Britain. Logan, acting again as a private citizen, sought to find a solution to avoid war between the two nations. He made little progress, and returned to America in 1810, two years before the outbreak of the War of 1812. There were two cases of attempted indictments under the Logan Act in the early 19th century, but the cases were dropped. No one has ever come close to being convicted of it. Modern Era Mentions of the Logan Act The Logan Act comes up when private citizens seem to be getting involved in diplomatic endeavors. In 1966, Staughton Lynd, a Quaker and college professor, traveled to North Vietnam with a small delegation on what he termed a fact-finding mission. The trip was very controversial, and there was speculation in the press that it might violate the Logan Act, but Lynd and his colleagues were never prosecuted. In the 1980s, Rev. Jesse Jackson embarked on some well-publicized trips to foreign countries, including Cuba and Syria. He obtained the release of political prisoners, and there were calls for him to be prosecuted under the Logan Act. The Jackson controversy ended in July 1984 when President Ronald Reagan said he believed no laws had been violated by Jacksons travels. In a more recent invocation of the Logan Act, critics of President Donald Trump contended his transition team violated the law by dealing with foreign powers before officially taking office. True to form, the Logan Act was mentioned, but no one was prosecuted for violating it.